By Anzoo Evaline.

Tension briefly mounted during the 4th council meeting of the Adjumani District Council after a motion seeking the reappointment of two members to the District Service Commission sparked a heated debate among councilors.

The motion was moved by the Leader of Government Business and also the Vice Chairperson, Kaijuka Richard Arthur, who argued that renewing the terms of the commissioners was necessary to ensure continuity in service delivery and avoid disruption in recruitment processes within the district.

Presenting the report of the District Executive Committee (DEC), Kaijuka explained that the district needed to act quickly because the wage bill allocated for recruiting technical staff could be exhausted by the end of the financial year if the Service Commission office does not function smoothly.

“The wage bill allocated to Adjumani District for recruitment of technical staff will be withdrawn by the end of the financial year. It is therefore important that we act in a timely and responsible manner to ensure continuity in the operation of the District Service Commission office,” he told the council.

Kaijuka then presented the names of two members whose terms were either expired or nearing expiry for renewal. They included Reverend Sister Maia Francis, whose term of office expired on 23rd February 2026, and Mr. Amoko Eugene Gudu, whose term is expected to end on 23rd May 2026.

However, the motion quickly drew criticism from some councilors who questioned the urgency of reappointing a member whose term had not yet expired.

The councilor representing Ciforo Sub-county, Anyanzo John Ambayo, challenged the move, saying council should follow the legal procedures governing the appointment of members to the District Service Commission.

“Mr. Speaker, it is indicated in the DEC meeting that the term of office that expired on 23rd February was for Mr. Amoko Eugene Gudu, and we are ready to approve his reappointment. But for the other member, the term is yet to expire in May. Why do we rush when the law says the process should begin after the expiration?” he asked.

The debate grew more intense when another councilor, Drichi Charles, representing Pakele Town Council, stood up to correct what he described as confusion in the names and terms of office presented in the motion.

“We have Reverend Sister Maria Francis whose term of office expired on 23rd February 2026, which is contrary to what he said. I also want to correct him because he said it is Amoko who can be reappointed. That was wrong. We need to amend that,” Drichi said.

He added that council should strictly act within the law and suggested that only the member whose term had already expired should be considered for approval.

“Maybe Mr. Speaker, if we are to act within the law, then we shall only approve one person,” he emphasized.

As the disagreement continued among councilors, the Speaker of the council, Oloya Jacob, intervened to calm the situation and guide the house on the way forward.

The Speaker directed the committee responsible for the matter to review the report and clarify the details before bringing it back for consideration.

“I want to urge the committee members to go back and review this matter and then present it to the District Executive Committee for further discussion. But for now, let us move to the next motion,” Oloya ruled.

The directive temporarily halted the debate and allowed the council to proceed with other business on the agenda, though the issue is expected to return for further deliberation once the committee completes its review.

The District Service Commission plays a key role in the recruitment and management of civil servants at the district level, making its composition a matter of significant interest to councilors and residents alike.

END.